Using folders as divider replacement works well.Disadvantage of the later - difficult to connect content of different outlines. There are argument for few files with lots of information and for multiple files with fewer information (quicker to load, easier to compare). Then again, using the search function of Finder (constrained to the directory in which you store you outlines) can quickly find the correct outline with the information you seek. Not fragmenting the topic over too many files might become a problem. But more complex topics (like perception) likely need different outlines. Works well when it comes to topics with little information or individual articles/books. Still looking for the best way to store information about topics in outlines. You can also expand hierarchical outlines only to those levels you actually want to use. Think of it as having the bones in the storage to create a new skeleton for text - later you just add the fleshed out text.
the source information) you can quickly create new writings. If you store your information in topic outlines (essentially, all information about one topic in one outline, incl. I still like the style with one content column and a source column. You can easily use outlines to plan your writing. (And to be honest, there was a scary bug that destroyed info on a page without giving you any information.) The ability to have all information on one topic in one file that still loads fast was great. I’ve tried out OmniOutliner as a Circus Ponies Notebook (CPN) replacement for a couple of months now.
0 kommentar(er)
